This article is brought to you by La Française.

Bond Allocation: still relevant in today’s market environment?

  • Does a bond allocation still make sense in a portfolio in today’s market environment? 

In the short term, we do not foresee any rate cuts. The Fed and the ECB are either above or around their inflation targets and given that we remain in a world of very high fiscal deficits, it is hard to see yield curves flattening significantly. However, looking further ahead, over a 3–6-month horizon, the situation is different. Real rates are historically high: around 1.8% in the US [1], the highest since 2008, and 0.7% in Europe [2], the highest since 2010. This raises the question if we should really avoid fixed income when rates are at historically elevated levels. Wasn’t the pre-2022 situation, with real rates at -1%, the one that was dangerous? 

  • What are the alternatives to bonds? Is it still relevant to invest in Treasuries?

Fixed income provides regular income. Today, among possible alternatives that are both fairly valued and as liquid as bonds, we don’t see any. On one side, there is private debt, which also provides regular income, but we do not consider this segment to be properly valued; on the other side, there is real estate, which lacks liquidity. As for Treasuries, the short end of the curve may make sense, while the long end appears more volatile given the uncertainties surrounding fiscal policy. 

  • What type of bonds remain attractive?

It all depends on the macro scenario. From our perspective, we have no specific concerns about the macro environment; we believe growth is holding up better than expected and that the risks of deep recessions have receded. In this context, it is preferable to focus on solutions that offer the highest carry, namely High Yield and subordinated debt. 

  • How should High Yield be integrated into a bond allocation today: a tactical opportunity or a strategic pillar?

Today, High Yield is both a tactical opportunity and a strategic pillar. Most High Yield companies have strengthened their balance sheets since the last crisis. They now show more prudent leverage ratios and better liquidity management. 

Admittedly, spreads are historically tight, but yields remain protective, offering a useful cushion against rate volatility. Depending on the geographic region, investors can also play different growth dynamics—for example, cyclical sectors in the U.S., supported by a stronger economy and a deep market, and more defensive sectors in Europe. So yes, High Yield still has its place as a tactical opportunity within a bond allocation for those looking to lock in attractive yields. 

High Yield can also be viewed as a strategic pillar. Historically, High Yield was associated with traditional sectors. Today, around 25% [3] of the market is exposed to long-term structural trends: Technology, Demographics, Climate and Energy Transition, and Urbanization. 

In this context, this segment of High Yield can be used to bet on tomorrow’s winners. A striking example: Tesla, rated B in 2017, is now BBB, while Renault, conversely, moved from BBB to BB+. 

These developments show that High Yield can be a gateway to innovative companies that are improving in quality, while also benefiting from the tightening of credit spreads that reflects this improvement. To sum up, integrating High Yield into an allocation allows, from a tactical perspective, capturing a protective carry, and from a strategic perspective, playing the innovation theme — which is very present in the equity market but less embraced on the credit side. In a world where sovereign debt alone is no longer sufficient to generate returns, High Yield clearly deserves its place in a balanced fixed income allocation.

 

[1] Market data 

[2] Market data 

[3] Market data 

 

MAIN RISKS: risk of capital loss, interest rate risk, credit risk, risk related to the impact of techniques, counterparty risk, legal risk, operational risk, sustainability risk. 

DISCLAIMER: Marketing communication for professional clients within the meaning of the MiFID II Directive. 

Past performance is not indicative of future results. 

For a complete description of risks and further information on strategies and all fees, please refer to the current prospectus and key information document, available in English at www.creditmutuel-am.eu. The customer inquiry and complaint policy implemented by Groupe La Française is available on our website. 

The information contained in this document does not constitute an offer or investment advice. Non-contractual information considered accurate at the date of publication and subject to change over time. Groupe La Française accepts no liability in the event of modification, distortion, or falsification of this communication. Any reproduction or alteration of this document is strictly prohibited without the express authorization of Groupe La Française. 

Source: Groupe La Française, January 2025. 

Crédit Mutuel Asset Management: 128, Boulevard Raspail, 75006 Paris. Portfolio management company authorized by the AMF under number GP 97 138. Public limited company with share capital of €3,871,680, registered with the Paris Trade and Companies Register under number 388 555 021, APE code 6630Z. Intra-community VAT: FR 70 388 555 021. Crédit Mutuel Asset Management is a subsidiary of Groupe La Française, the asset management holding company of Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale. 

La Française AM Finance Services, investment firm authorized by the ACPR under number 18673 (www.acpr.banque-france.fr) and registered with ORIAS (www.orias.fr) under number 25003045 since 11/04/2025. 

La Française, 128 Boulevard Raspail, Paris, France 75006, +33 (0)1 73 00 73 00.