Can a tobacco firm really be sustainable? Yes, according to flawed ESG ratings

Back

Ratings agencies are missing crucial aspects of ESG analysis and taking a top-down approach that leads to perverse outcomes such as tobacco companies scoring highly on ESG factors, says Aegon Asset Management. Euan Ker, Sustainable Investment Analyst at Aegon AM, believes ratings agencies employ flawed methodologies that award strong ESG ratings to fundamentally unsustainable companies. “Third-party ESG ratings are just inputs,” he says. “They are not the whole story. ESG screens generally do not consider the sustainability of the company’s products or services, by focusing mostly on how a company operates, rather than what it does.

Register or log in to continue reading. Investment Officer is an independent journalism platform for professionals working in the Luxembourg investment industry.

A subscription is free for professionals working at banks and independent asset managers.